Olmo 3: Charting a path through the model flow to lead open-source AI
1–10 of 135 posts
Re: Olmo 3: Charting a path through the model flow to lead open-source AI
#2> the best fully open 32B-scale thinking model
It's absolutely fantastic that they're releasing an actually OSS model, but isn't "the best fully open" a bit of a low bar? I'm not aware of any other fully open models.
Re: Olmo 3: Charting a path through the model flow to lead open-source AI
#3These small models are very cheap for "good enough" translations. I just translated 6M comments on my platform with Gemma 32B and this model seems to be on par.
It's cheap enough that I'm currently doing a second pass where another model critiques and if needed, rewrites the original translation.
Re: Olmo 3: Charting a path through the model flow to lead open-source AI
#4> the best fully open 32B-scale thinking model It's absolutely fantastic that they're releasing an actually OSS model, but isn't "the best fully open" a bit of a low bar? I'm not aware of any other fully open models.
Yeah. There are other fully open models like Hugging Face SmolLM but they are not common.
Re: Olmo 3: Charting a path through the model flow to lead open-source AI
#5To see OlmoTrace go to https://playground.allenai.org/ and after you get the responce to your prompt, click the secod icon from the right on the top (at least on mobile). It took me a while to find it because there is another icon under the responce that looks the same but does something else.
Re: Olmo 3: Charting a path through the model flow to lead open-source AI
#6Clear pak LLMs are rare. The term open source has become co-opted, so I think we need a new term for LLMs who's alignment is known.
Re: Olmo 3: Charting a path through the model flow to lead open-source AI
#7> the best fully open 32B-scale thinking model It's absolutely fantastic that they're releasing an actually OSS model, but isn't "the best fully open" a bit of a low bar? I'm not aware of any other fully open models.
Well if open source is one of your USP, then better mention that right? Open Source people tend to also like that their work is.. open source.
And otherwise you 1on1 start competing with notsoOpenAI, or say Llama.
Re: Olmo 3: Charting a path through the model flow to lead open-source AI
#8> the best fully open 32B-scale thinking model It's absolutely fantastic that they're releasing an actually OSS model, but isn't "the best fully open" a bit of a low bar? I'm not aware of any other fully open models.
Well if open source is one of your USP, then better mention that right? Open Source people tend to also like that their work is.. open source. And otherwise you 1on1 start competing with notsoOpenAI, or say Llama.
My observation was more on "best", rather than on "fully open". It's like Apple saying "this is the best iPhone" for every new iPhone.
Re: Olmo 3: Charting a path through the model flow to lead open-source AI
#9[dead]
Re: Olmo 3: Charting a path through the model flow to lead open-source AI
#10These small models are very cheap for "good enough" translations. I just translated 6M comments on my platform with Gemma 32B and this model seems to be on par. It's cheap enough that I'm currently doing a second pass where another model critiques and if needed, rewrites the original translation.
Second run with same Gemma? Perhaps 12b would perform similarly or not?