Live data from Hacker News

Virgin and Qantas to ban use of portable power banks after string of fires

abc.net.au

1–10 of 78 posts

Re: Virgin and Qantas to ban use of portable power banks after string of fires

#3
Meanwhile you can carry a nuclear bomb on a train and nobody even bothers to check the id or ticket up until you are on board.

Irrational fear of flight strikes again, it's a very long list actually of standards that aviation has to comply with in order not to thrive but to merely exist , all because people are irrationally fearful about being suspended mid air.

It's the same thing for nuclear

Re: Virgin and Qantas to ban use of portable power banks after string of fires

#4

Meanwhile you can carry a nuclear bomb on a train and nobody even bothers to check the id or ticket up until you are on board. Irrational fear of flight strikes again, it's a very long list actually of standards that aviation has to comply with in order not to thrive but to merely exist , all because people are irrationally fearful about being suspended mid air. It's the same thing for nuclear

Most people don't have nuclear bombs.

Re: Virgin and Qantas to ban use of portable power banks after string of fires

#6
post #4

Meanwhile you can carry a nuclear bomb on a train and nobody even bothers to check the id or ticket up until you are on board. Irrational fear of flight strikes again, it's a very long list actually of standards that aviation has to comply with in order not to thrive but to merely exist , all because people are irrationally fearful about being suspended mid air. It's the same thing for nuclear

Most people don't have nuclear bombs.

Yes but what I mean is that nobody checks anything

Re: Virgin and Qantas to ban use of portable power banks after string of fires

#8

Meanwhile you can carry a nuclear bomb on a train and nobody even bothers to check the id or ticket up until you are on board. Irrational fear of flight strikes again, it's a very long list actually of standards that aviation has to comply with in order not to thrive but to merely exist , all because people are irrationally fearful about being suspended mid air. It's the same thing for nuclear

A train can go from "cruising speed" to letting passengers off to escape a fire in about a minute.

A plane might take anywhere from five minutes to several hours to be able to safely let passengers out.

Personally I feel that's a good enough reason to impose more robust restrictions on Things Which May Cause Fire on planes compared to trains. Especially in the case of lithium batteries where they're more or less impossible to extinguish one they're going.

Re: Virgin and Qantas to ban use of portable power banks after string of fires

#9
post #8

Meanwhile you can carry a nuclear bomb on a train and nobody even bothers to check the id or ticket up until you are on board. Irrational fear of flight strikes again, it's a very long list actually of standards that aviation has to comply with in order not to thrive but to merely exist , all because people are irrationally fearful about being suspended mid air. It's the same thing for nuclear

A train can go from "cruising speed" to letting passengers off to escape a fire in about a minute. A plane might take anywhere from five minutes to several hours to be able to safely let passengers out. Personally I feel that's a good enough reason to impose more robust restrictions on Things Which May Cause Fire on planes compared to trains. Especially in the case of lithium batteries where they're more or less impo…

[flagged]

Re: Virgin and Qantas to ban use of portable power banks after string of fires

#10
The title is misleading unless you read it carefully.

They are not banning bringing power banks, they are banning using power banks. On the plane you have to keep the power bank on your person, but not use it.

This would be a lot more defensible if they had high-power USB-C ports by every seat.

Post reply on HN