Live data from Hacker News

Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit

djnn.sh

1–10 of 349 posts

Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit

#3
post #2

Even Claude thinks the report is bullshit. https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1989636669889560897

    Even your own AI model doesn't buy your propaganda
Let's not pretend the output of LLMs has any meaningful value when it comes to facts, especially not for recent events.

Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit

#4
Does Anthropic currently have cybersec people able to provide a standard assessment of the kind the community expects?

This could be a corporate move as some people claim, but I wonder if the cause is simply that their talents are currently somewhere else and they don’t have the company structure in place to deliver properly in this matter.

(If that is the case they are not then free of blame, it’s just a different conversation)

Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit

#8
This article does seem to raise some serious issues with the anthropic report. I wonder if anthropic will release proof of what they claim, or whether the report was a marketing/scare-tactic push to have AI used by defender, like the article suggests it is?

Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit

#9
Its seems that various LLM companies try to fear monger. Saying how dangerous it is to use them in "certain ways". With the possible intention to lobby for legislation.

But what is the big game here? Is it all about creating gates to keep out other LLM companies getting market share? (Only our model is safe to use) Or how sincere are the concerncs regarding LLMs?

Post reply on HN