Live data from Hacker News

Kodak ran a nuclear device in its basement for decades

popularmechanics.com

1–10 of 172 posts

Re: Kodak ran a nuclear device in its basement for decades

#6

Quote: "and though it takes roughly 100 pounds of it to build an atomic bomb...” Are they stupid at PM or just selling misinformation?

This matches other sources on the internet: a bomb requires about 15kg of U-235 [0] with a good use of neutron reflectors, and HEU by definition contains 20%+ of U-235 [1]. We don't know exactly what the U-235 concentration was in the Kodak device, but reasonable values would make the claim "roughly" correct.

[0] https://www.britannica.com/technology/nuclear-weapon/Princip...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enriched_uranium

Re: Kodak ran a nuclear device in its basement for decades

#7

Quote: "and though it takes roughly 100 pounds of it to build an atomic bomb...” Are they stupid at PM or just selling misinformation?

At least it wasn't "though it takes at least the equivalent of 12.5 bald eagles of it to build an atomic bomb"
Post reply on HN