Honda: 2 years of ml vs 1 month of prompting - heres what we learned
1–10 of 115 posts
Re: Honda: 2 years of ml vs 1 month of prompting - heres what we learned
#2Re: Honda: 2 years of ml vs 1 month of prompting - heres what we learned
#3If all the bullshit hype and marketing would evaporate already (“LLMs will replace all jobs!”), stuff like this would float to the top more and companies with large data sets would almost certainly be clamoring for drop-in analysis solutions based on prompt construction. They’d likely be far happier with the results, too, instead of fielding complaints from workers about it (AI) being rammed down their throats at every turn.
Re: Honda: 2 years of ml vs 1 month of prompting - heres what we learned
#4And this is where the strengths of LLMs really lie: making performant ML available to a wider audience, without requiring PHDs in Computer Science or Mathematics to build. It’s consistently where I spend my time tinkering with these, albeit in a local-only environment. If all the bullshit hype and marketing would evaporate already (“LLMs will replace all jobs!”), stuff like this would float to the top more and compan…
Re: Honda: 2 years of ml vs 1 month of prompting - heres what we learned
#5And this is where the strengths of LLMs really lie: making performant ML available to a wider audience, without requiring PHDs in Computer Science or Mathematics to build. It’s consistently where I spend my time tinkering with these, albeit in a local-only environment. If all the bullshit hype and marketing would evaporate already (“LLMs will replace all jobs!”), stuff like this would float to the top more and compan…
^ This. I'm waiting for an LLM where I can just point it to a repo, slurp it up, and let me ask questions about it.
Re: Honda: 2 years of ml vs 1 month of prompting - heres what we learned
#6And this is where the strengths of LLMs really lie: making performant ML available to a wider audience, without requiring PHDs in Computer Science or Mathematics to build. It’s consistently where I spend my time tinkering with these, albeit in a local-only environment. If all the bullshit hype and marketing would evaporate already (“LLMs will replace all jobs!”), stuff like this would float to the top more and compan…
^ This. I'm waiting for an LLM where I can just point it to a repo, slurp it up, and let me ask questions about it.
Re: Honda: 2 years of ml vs 1 month of prompting - heres what we learned
#7 - text classification, not text generation
- operating on existing unstructured input
- existing solution was extremely limited (string matching)
- comparing LLM to similar but older methods of using neural networks to match
- seemingly no negative consequences to warranty customers themselves of mis-classification (the data is used to improve process, not to make decisions)Re: Honda: 2 years of ml vs 1 month of prompting - heres what we learned
#8Re: Honda: 2 years of ml vs 1 month of prompting - heres what we learned
#9And this is where the strengths of LLMs really lie: making performant ML available to a wider audience, without requiring PHDs in Computer Science or Mathematics to build. It’s consistently where I spend my time tinkering with these, albeit in a local-only environment. If all the bullshit hype and marketing would evaporate already (“LLMs will replace all jobs!”), stuff like this would float to the top more and compan…
^ This. I'm waiting for an LLM where I can just point it to a repo, slurp it up, and let me ask questions about it.
Ask away. Best method I’ve found so far for this.
Re: Honda: 2 years of ml vs 1 month of prompting - heres what we learned
#10“ Fun fact: Translating French and Spanish claims into German first improved technical accuracy—an unexpected perk of Germany’s automotive dominance.”