PostgreSQL deserves better than libpq
twitter.com
PostgreSQL deserves better than libpq
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: PostgreSQL deserves better than libpq
#2Re: PostgreSQL deserves better than libpq
#3Background https://bitbucket.org/tildeslash/libzdb/src/b38570e6190312d9...
I can't see the commit diff in my mobile browser, well done Atlassian.
Could you perhaps provide more context beyond a link?
Re: PostgreSQL deserves better than libpq
#4Re: PostgreSQL deserves better than libpq
#5The whole diff in that (pointless?) commit...:
* Note: Due to design limitations in both libpq and PostgreSQL's
- * architecture, this implementation does not support the memory-bounded- * streaming behavior available with MySQL and Oracle.
+ * architecture, this implementation does not support the superior
+ * memory-bounded streaming behavior we use with MySQL and Oracle.
Re: PostgreSQL deserves better than libpq
#6Background https://bitbucket.org/tildeslash/libzdb/src/b38570e6190312d9...
I can't see the commit diff in my mobile browser, well done Atlassian. Could you perhaps provide more context beyond a link?
They added the addictive "superior" to describe mysqls implementation in their docs. That's the entire change. No code changes. Seems like a petty change antithetical to good documentation.
Re: PostgreSQL deserves better than libpq
#7Re: PostgreSQL deserves better than libpq
#8Background https://bitbucket.org/tildeslash/libzdb/src/b38570e6190312d9...
By mistake, I used a link to an insignificant commit while I was attempting to link to this comment block with more context.
https://bitbucket.org/tildeslash/libzdb/src/master/src/db/po...