$2.2B solar plant in California turned off after years of wasted money
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: $2.2B solar plant in California turned off after years of wasted money
#2https://www.gem.wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Electric_Generating_Syste...
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
(solar PV prices declined far faster than expected; combined with concentrated solar thermal operational challenges, it led to the plant being uneconomical; could potentially be re-powered as solar PV)
Re: $2.2B solar plant in California turned off after years of wasted money
#3Re: $2.2B solar plant in California turned off after years of wasted money
#4Surely you can find a better source than the tabloid rag NY Post
Re: $2.2B solar plant in California turned off after years of wasted money
#5I never knew until today that solar plants require fossil fuels.
Re: $2.2B solar plant in California turned off after years of wasted money
#6Re: $2.2B solar plant in California turned off after years of wasted money
#7The Wikipedia article says: "The plant burns natural gas each morning to commence operation... In 2014, the plant burned 868×109 British thermal units (254 GWh) of natural gas emitting 46,084 metric tons of carbon dioxide...". I never knew until today that solar plants require fossil fuels.
Re: $2.2B solar plant in California turned off after years of wasted money
#8Surely you can find a better source than the tabloid rag NY Post
Re: $2.2B solar plant in California turned off after years of wasted money
#9At least until batteries got cheap too.
Now it's super niche.
Also, some quick calculations based on the average yearly generation and estimated PPA suggests that it generated electricity worth roughly the same amount as the big scary number in the headline.
Presumably the PPA was set up pay for the construction plus profit over some timescale. Paying it off after 10 years isn't great but it's not bad either.