How HubSpot scaled AI adoption
product.hubspot.com
How HubSpot scaled AI adoption
1–10 of 50 posts
Re: How HubSpot scaled AI adoption
#2The mention of "HubSpot" triggered a memory... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11369632 - wow, can't believe how long ago this was! Anyways, not surprised that a company where 1 + 1 = 3 would be big on AI.
Re: How HubSpot scaled AI adoption
#3Is this the company that hacked and attempted to extort a journalist who wrote about them?
Re: How HubSpot scaled AI adoption
#4[dead]
Re: How HubSpot scaled AI adoption
#5Honestly its been pretty wild to see this company succeed over the years. They took on Salesforce and everyone predicted they were going to fail. Yet year over year they've continued to succeed.
Re: How HubSpot scaled AI adoption
#6The article isn’t providing a lot of convincing data that AI improved much of anything, only that it didn’t cause incidents.
I really don’t understand why AI usage is mandatory for roles. Nobody’s doing anything like that for other productivity tools even when they’re proven to be helpful. Hell, a lot of employers can’t be bothered to provide basics like nice keyboards and monitors that exceed 1080p.
The current era of tech has way too many corporate losers.
Re: How HubSpot scaled AI adoption
#7>measurable but modest productivity improvements
No mention of how this was measured.
Re: How HubSpot scaled AI adoption
#8>measurable but modest productivity improvements No mention of how this was measured.
> We pulled metrics on code review burden, cycle time, velocity comparisons before and after adoption, and production incident rates.
Re: How HubSpot scaled AI adoption
#9The article isn’t providing a lot of convincing data that AI improved much of anything, only that it didn’t cause incidents. I really don’t understand why AI usage is mandatory for roles. Nobody’s doing anything like that for other productivity tools even when they’re proven to be helpful. Hell, a lot of employers can’t be bothered to provide basics like nice keyboards and monitors that exceed 1080p. The current era…
People that don't code think that something can do code 98% correct is surely better, without seeing the hard enforcement of a 2% error without manual intervention. I think all of the jokes about stupid computers and weird behavior of languages when you use them out of spec (famously labeled wat) gave people the wrong impressions about why those problems exist or how they can or cannot be fixed. You'd think they'd be able to transfer that cynicism quicker to models since they are also dumb computer things but apparently they say "hello" and that is tricking them out of that?
Re: How HubSpot scaled AI adoption
#10The article isn’t providing a lot of convincing data that AI improved much of anything, only that it didn’t cause incidents. I really don’t understand why AI usage is mandatory for roles. Nobody’s doing anything like that for other productivity tools even when they’re proven to be helpful. Hell, a lot of employers can’t be bothered to provide basics like nice keyboards and monitors that exceed 1080p. The current era…
The monitors thing is funny to me because I love using dual monitors at work, and my coworker doesn't, and this forced AI adoption would be like if I forced him to use dual monitors.