Why haven't local-first apps become popular?
marcobambini.substack.com
Why haven't local-first apps become popular?
1–10 of 494 posts
Re: Why haven't local-first apps become popular?
#2Re: Why haven't local-first apps become popular?
#3The future? I thought all apps were like this before this web2.0 thing ruined it.
Re: Why haven't local-first apps become popular?
#4Lotus Notes solved syncing for object databases but the world forgot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HCL_Notes
Re: Why haven't local-first apps become popular?
#5Re: Why haven't local-first apps become popular?
#6I.e., most people don’t care.
Local-first is optimal for creative and productivity apps. (Conversely, non-local-first are terrible for these.)
But most people are neither creative nor optimally productive (or care to be).
Re: Why haven't local-first apps become popular?
#7If you think this is only a problem for distributed systems, I have bad news for you.
Re: Why haven't local-first apps become popular?
#8Local-first and decentralized apps haven't become popular because SaaS has a vastly superior economic model, and more money means more to be invested in both polish (UI/UX) and marketing.
All the technical challenges of decentralized or local-first apps are solvable. They are no harder than the technical challenges of doing cloud at scale. If there was money in it, those problems would be solved at least as well.
Cloud SaaS is both unbreakable DRM (you don't even give the user the code, sometimes not even their data) and an impossible to evade subscription model. That's why it's the dominant model for software delivery, at least 90% of the time. The billing system is the tail that wags the dog.
There are some types of apps that have intrinsic benefits to being in the cloud, but they're the minority. These are apps that require huge data sets, large amounts of burstable compute, or that integrate tightly with real world services to the point that they're really just front-ends for something IRL. Even for these, it would be possible to have only certain parts of them live in the cloud.
Re: Why haven't local-first apps become popular?
#9Now that people are used to having someone in a data center do their backing up and distributing for them, they don't want to that work themselves again, privacy be damned.
Re: Why haven't local-first apps become popular?
#10I guess I should bring my devices back to exactly 1 device. Or just take a subscription on one service.