The OSS code that powers Claude and the maintainer they didn't hire
agenticweb.nearestnabors.com
The OSS code that powers Claude and the maintainer they didn't hire
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: The OSS code that powers Claude and the maintainer they didn't hire
#2A follow up interview with Robin Grell after his story blew up on Hacker News. Focuses on his work in opensource, what Enigo is, and why input simulation is so important right now.
Re: The OSS code that powers Claude and the maintainer they didn't hire
#3> Permissive opensource licensing that lets companies extract infinite value while giving nothing back
Why is this categorised as a "broken system"? I keep seeing this written about OSS, and it's just not true. I can choose to volunteer at a charity, and I can choose to sign a contract and get a day job. The charity is not extracting infinite value from me; I chose to do work for no recompense.
And, just to drive the point home about the ignorance of the people that peddle this sort of thing, why is the estimated value of this code "infinite"?
Re: The OSS code that powers Claude and the maintainer they didn't hire
#4I sympathize with him but the title is a bit hyperbole.
Re: The OSS code that powers Claude and the maintainer they didn't hire
#5> Permissive opensource licensing that lets companies extract infinite value while giving nothing back Why is this categorised as a "broken system"? I keep seeing this written about OSS, and it's just not true. I can choose to volunteer at a charity, and I can choose to sign a contract and get a day job. The charity is not extracting infinite value from me; I chose to do work for no recompense. And, just to drive the…
Because while you can give as much time as you like as a single person, the charity can't clone you an infinite amount of times and get infinite value out of you for free.
Re: The OSS code that powers Claude and the maintainer they didn't hire
#6> Permissive opensource licensing that lets companies extract infinite value while giving nothing back Why is this categorised as a "broken system"? I keep seeing this written about OSS, and it's just not true. I can choose to volunteer at a charity, and I can choose to sign a contract and get a day job. The charity is not extracting infinite value from me; I chose to do work for no recompense. And, just to drive the…
Would you volunteer if, instead of a charity, it was a corporation? Would you go work at any tech company for free while they make thousands of millions off that work?
Re: The OSS code that powers Claude and the maintainer they didn't hire
#7> Permissive opensource licensing that lets companies extract infinite value while giving nothing back Why is this categorised as a "broken system"? I keep seeing this written about OSS, and it's just not true. I can choose to volunteer at a charity, and I can choose to sign a contract and get a day job. The charity is not extracting infinite value from me; I chose to do work for no recompense. And, just to drive the…
Would you volunteer if, instead of a charity, it was a corporation? Would you go work at any tech company for free while they make thousands of millions off that work?
The maintainer of this package can stop whenever they want. They can stop dealing with bugs unrelated to their own use case (android) whenever they feel like it.