FDA approves new Covid-19 vaccines in US but limits who can get them
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: FDA approves new Covid-19 vaccines in US but limits who can get them
#2It's back to masks for this family.
Re: FDA approves new Covid-19 vaccines in US but limits who can get them
#3So they mandate ... who can't get them?
Re: FDA approves new Covid-19 vaccines in US but limits who can get them
#4And then they end the text with a quote from a PR expert founder of a pro-vaccine NGO:
> Fatima is an experienced advocate, strategist, and crisis management expert with a background spanning political campaigns, civil rights advocacy, and corporate communications. She has worked with leading PR agencies such as Hill & Knowlton and Porter Novelli, as well as independently advising high-profile clients on crisis management, media relations, and public affairs.
I see 0 expertise in medicine, clinical trials or other scientific work. That reduces these statements to agenda driven PR:
> “Our healthcare system is now solidly anti-children and anti-science,” Fatima Khan, co-founder of the Protect Their Future group, which advocates for vaccine access.
> “The data are clear: young children – especially infants – remain highly vulnerable to severe illness and hospitalization from Covid-19. By restricting access to safe, evidence-based vaccines, federal leaders are choosing ideology over science.”
Re: FDA approves new Covid-19 vaccines in US but limits who can get them
#5Re: FDA approves new Covid-19 vaccines in US but limits who can get them
#6>Robert F Kennedy Jr, the US health secretary, said in a post on Twitter/X that Covid vaccine “mandates” under Joe Biden are now rescinded and that the vaccines will be available to those at high risk. So they mandate ... who can't get them?
Re: FDA approves new Covid-19 vaccines in US but limits who can get them
#7Re: FDA approves new Covid-19 vaccines in US but limits who can get them
#8[flagged]
Re: FDA approves new Covid-19 vaccines in US but limits who can get them
#9[flagged]
If people didn’t want them, Kennedy wouldn’t have had to prevent people from getting them. All of the attacks on scientists, experts being fired so they can be replaced with cranks, etc. happened because the preponderance of evidence shows mRNA vaccines are safe and effective, and would have been approved under science-based policies.
Re: FDA approves new Covid-19 vaccines in US but limits who can get them
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
If people didn’t want them, Kennedy wouldn’t have had to prevent people from getting them. All of the attacks on scientists, experts being fired so they can be replaced with cranks, etc. happened because the preponderance of evidence shows mRNA vaccines are safe and effective, and would have been approved under science-based policies.
Why would I sane person keep putting these uncontrollable spike-protein-producing machines in their bodies?! Don't they read the studies that the spike protein is found in all kinds of organs and tissues years after vaccination, mainly in the brain though? The protein is considered toxic. There's also an IgG4 issue with mRNA vaccination. Many long haulers actually have vaccine injury - I am one of them. Right after t…
These vaccines produce spike proteins for one expression cycle proportional to their dose. They are far from "uncontrollable" or particularly complex.
> We're no longer in a pandemic and we should be careful about these vaccines, which, by the way, are not sterilizing either, so, they hold a very little epidemiological value.
You are spouting a lot of sensationalist, internet-meme-medicine. Obviously every medical intervention should be studied. And they are, or were, before trumpty dumpty and his merry band of meme doctors fucked healthcare research in the US for a few years. The risks of COVID far outweigh the risk of taking the vaccine and it also helps people who are at risk who can't take the vaccine.