Jujutsu and Radicle
radicle.xyz
Jujutsu and Radicle
1–10 of 97 posts
Re: Jujutsu and Radicle
#2Follow along with Fintan as he details how he put his Git workflow into submission with Jujutsu and Radicle
Re: Jujutsu and Radicle
#3Just waiting for Jujutsu to support submodules and I can replace git completely.
Re: Jujutsu and Radicle
#4Jujutsu is so good. I'm using a megamerge workflow and absolutely loving it!
Re: Jujutsu and Radicle
#5I think this is the first blog on JJ that has made me want to use it. The flow seems like it could be quite a bit better than git
Re: Jujutsu and Radicle
#6How are these patch sets reviewed? Is there some mechanism for integrating with review systems like GitHub?
Re: Jujutsu and Radicle
#7I’ve started using Jujutsu recently and was surprised at how low friction it was to switch. If you’re like the author and keep hearing about it without giving it a shot, I suggest you just sit down and try it – it’s a lot less effort than you might expect.
Re: Jujutsu and Radicle
#8Yup. Still 0 incentive to try jj. I’m still very much convinced most of the problems solved by jj either do not exist or are already solved by recent features of git.
It’s good alternatives of popular tools exist but git would not be my first bet as a tool that needs fixing…
Re: Jujutsu and Radicle
#9How are these patch sets reviewed? Is there some mechanism for integrating with review systems like GitHub?
From git's perspective, jj bookmarks are just regular git branches, so you can just do `jj git push` and open a PR as usual.
However, unlike git, jj bookmarks are pinned to change IDs instead of immutable commit SHA-1s. This means that stacked PRs just work: Change something in the pr-1 bookmark, and all dependent bookmarks (pr-2, pr-3, ...) are automatically updated. A `jj git push --tracked` later and everything is pushed.
Re: Jujutsu and Radicle
#10Yup. Still 0 incentive to try jj. I’m still very much convinced most of the problems solved by jj either do not exist or are already solved by recent features of git. It’s good alternatives of popular tools exist but git would not be my first bet as a tool that needs fixing…
Why say yup to disagree with the premise of the article?