Comparison of different C libraries providing generic containers capabilities

Post by lemper » Wed, Aug 13, 2025, 2:45 PM UTC

Post by mananaysiempre » Sun, Aug 17, 2025, 3:17 PM UTC

fuhsnn wrote: post #2

I'd love to have some of these libraries in slimcc's test pool, but almost every one of them have hard-coded assumptions to gcc/clang/msvc/tcc in their scripts that are tiresome to undo. For example: MLIB: assumed GCC https://github.com/P-p-H-d/mlib/blob/4b9c213831624486814a483... STC: assumed -fopenmp https://github.com/stclib/STC/blob/de7313a58f748d9a6da751eb9... CC: assumed clang https://github.com/JacksonAllan/CC…

Post by fuhsnn » Sun, Aug 17, 2025, 3:44 PM UTC

mananaysiempre wrote: post #3

fuhsnn wrote: post #2

I'd love to have some of these libraries in slimcc's test pool, but almost every one of them have hard-coded assumptions to gcc/clang/msvc/tcc in their scripts that are tiresome to undo. For example: MLIB: assumed GCC https://github.com/P-p-H-d/mlib/blob/4b9c213831624486814a483... STC: assumed -fopenmp https://github.com/stclib/STC/blob/de7313a58f748d9a6da751eb9... CC: assumed clang https://github.com/JacksonAllan/CC…

The first two should be fixable by invoking make WCFLAGS_GCC= and make LDFLAGS= respectively. (An assignment like FOO=bar in the makefile is a default [1], overridable by passing FOO=baz as one of the arguments to make. FOO?=bar can additionally be overridden by setting FOO to a different value in the environment.) [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Overridin...