Why Metaflow?
docs.metaflow.org
Why Metaflow?
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: Why Metaflow?
#2There's been so much great innovation in the ML ops space in the last few years and metaflow puts you in a straightjacket that prevents you from tapping into any of it.
Re: Why Metaflow?
#3I don't understand why this framework has become so popular. You can't instantiate or program around `FlowSpec`s. The type safety is terrible (you're supposed to just haphazardly assign to `self` whenever you need to persist something across steps). `step`s just feel like glorified jupyter cells. There's been so much great innovation in the ML ops space in the last few years and metaflow puts you in a straightjacket…
Re: Why Metaflow?
#4I don't understand why this framework has become so popular. You can't instantiate or program around `FlowSpec`s. The type safety is terrible (you're supposed to just haphazardly assign to `self` whenever you need to persist something across steps). `step`s just feel like glorified jupyter cells. There's been so much great innovation in the ML ops space in the last few years and metaflow puts you in a straightjacket…
Off the top of your head, could you describe a good/great ml ops infra setup? I've been reading what I can about state of the art ml ops after not being in the space for a few years and metaflow comes up a lot.