When reading a book on a topic/field you are unfamiliar, how do you validate that what you are reading it's not BS? For example, i want to read a book about geopolitics that makes statements about a certain phenomenon. How do i know the arguments are not completely BS vs different position/views/opinion of the phenomenon?
When reading a book how do you validate the thesis in an unknown field for you?
1–2 of 2 posts
Re: When reading a book how do you validate the thesis in an unknown field for you?
#2You read the reviews about the book and get a sense of how it was received.
This is why I've never read Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind by Yuval Noah
Although a best seller, the scholarly reception was not great, and I'd just rather read other things.
Sometimes, though, I still want to read those books to see the author's arguments/points.