Hyperpb: Faster dynamic Protobuf parsing
1–10 of 21 posts
Re: Hyperpb: Faster dynamic Protobuf parsing
#2Re: Hyperpb: Faster dynamic Protobuf parsing
#3Re: Hyperpb: Faster dynamic Protobuf parsing
#4(IMO much more interesting article than this announcement, and that probably should have gotten more attention than it did.)
Re: Hyperpb: Faster dynamic Protobuf parsing
#5Really missed a great naming opportunity with "superpb" (pronounced as "superb").
Re: Hyperpb: Faster dynamic Protobuf parsing
#6Re: Hyperpb: Faster dynamic Protobuf parsing
#7The delta to the performance of C++/Rust Protobuf implementations would be interesting.
Re: Hyperpb: Faster dynamic Protobuf parsing
#8Interesting approach using a JIT compiler. It says compilation is slow, is there a way to persist the compiled code and load it later (for example for CLIs or faster redeployments)?
Re: Hyperpb: Faster dynamic Protobuf parsing
#9The delta to the performance of C++/Rust Protobuf implementations would be interesting.
Even before Hyperpb, Go was already very competitive, e.g. this article from last year: https://www.greptime.com/blogs/2024-04-09-rust-protobuf-perf...
Re: Hyperpb: Faster dynamic Protobuf parsing
#10Really missed a great naming opportunity with "superpb" (pronounced as "superb").