Live data from Hacker News

The Architecture Behind Lovable and Bolt

beam.cloud

1–10 of 33 posts

Re: The Architecture Behind Lovable and Bolt

#2
"We’ll be using FastMCP, a lightweight framework for building model-control-plane servers"

Article written by AI (and not reviewed by humans) that doesn't know MCP is model context protocol?

Or author being intentional for some weird reason?

Re: The Architecture Behind Lovable and Bolt

#3
Q: Has anyone on HN built anything meaningful with Lovable/Bolt? Something that works as intended?

I’ve tried several proof of concepts with Bolt and every time just get into a doom loop where there is a cycle of breakage, each ‘fix’ resurrecting a previous ‘break’

Re: The Architecture Behind Lovable and Bolt

#6
post #3

Q: Has anyone on HN built anything meaningful with Lovable/Bolt? Something that works as intended? I’ve tried several proof of concepts with Bolt and every time just get into a doom loop where there is a cycle of breakage, each ‘fix’ resurrecting a previous ‘break’

I too have tried them and would like to know this.

Re: The Architecture Behind Lovable and Bolt

#7
post #3

Q: Has anyone on HN built anything meaningful with Lovable/Bolt? Something that works as intended? I’ve tried several proof of concepts with Bolt and every time just get into a doom loop where there is a cycle of breakage, each ‘fix’ resurrecting a previous ‘break’

I recently played a little story based game that was hosted on Lovable. It worked reasonably well!

Re: The Architecture Behind Lovable and Bolt

#8
post #3

Q: Has anyone on HN built anything meaningful with Lovable/Bolt? Something that works as intended? I’ve tried several proof of concepts with Bolt and every time just get into a doom loop where there is a cycle of breakage, each ‘fix’ resurrecting a previous ‘break’

[dead]

Re: The Architecture Behind Lovable and Bolt

#9
post #2

"We’ll be using FastMCP, a lightweight framework for building model-control-plane servers" Article written by AI (and not reviewed by humans) that doesn't know MCP is model context protocol? Or author being intentional for some weird reason?

Looks like AI slop
Post reply on HN