Grammarly acquires Superhuman
reuters.com
Grammarly acquires Superhuman
1–10 of 144 posts
Re: Grammarly acquires Superhuman
#2Salesforce did this with Quip, Slack, etc.
Re: Grammarly acquires Superhuman
#3Re: Grammarly acquires Superhuman
#4This feels like a pattern of grammarly becoming a holdco / following the Salesforce playbook. Find companies with - solid but not breakout growth (and probably slowing) - a loyal cult following - raised at too high a valuation in the peak era - talented teams - still founder led by strong product thinkers Salesforce did this with Quip, Slack, etc.
We should see more of this as large, profitable startups have grown into long term private companies with no need to go public.
Re: Grammarly acquires Superhuman
#5Re: Grammarly acquires Superhuman
#6Dry powder to do what?! Is this americanism? I've been here for over 8 years and every month I find some wording that's just bizarre, like as if there was a competition for ways in how to confuse someone.
Re: Grammarly acquires Superhuman
#7Grammarly is one of the tools I pay for, and I am worried about the security risks of using it. Really wish there was an alternative that: 1) Does local processing (local LLM?) instead of sending all my data to their server. 2) Had a lightweight Chrome extension that didn't inject many MBs of scripts on each page.
What are you using Grammarly for, is it just spell/grammar checking or something more? Is the UX particularly good? Personally I tried it some years ago but didn't understand/see what is/was special about it.
Re: Grammarly acquires Superhuman
#8> Grammarly's acquisition of Superhuman follows its recent $1 billion funding from General Catalyst, which gives it dry powder to create a collection of AI-powered workplace tools. Dry powder to do what?! Is this americanism? I've been here for over 8 years and every month I find some wording that's just bizarre, like as if there was a competition for ways in how to confuse someone.
Re: Grammarly acquires Superhuman
#9Grammarly is one of the tools I pay for, and I am worried about the security risks of using it. Really wish there was an alternative that: 1) Does local processing (local LLM?) instead of sending all my data to their server. 2) Had a lightweight Chrome extension that didn't inject many MBs of scripts on each page.