Live data from Hacker News

Men, where have you gone? Please come back

nytimes.com

1–10 of 53 posts

Re: Men, where have you gone? Please come back

#6
My ChatGPT meter tells me that it *feels* like this was written by AI:

Notice the excessive use of the em dash throughout the article combined with the sycophantic contrasts ChatGPT loves to use so much:

"It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless."

A sad state of affairs if the NYT is letting AI-slop through.

Re: Men, where have you gone? Please come back

#7

My ChatGPT meter tells me that it *feels* like this was written by AI: Notice the excessive use of the em dash throughout the article combined with the sycophantic contrasts ChatGPT loves to use so much: "It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless." A sad state of affairs if the NYT is letting AI-slop through.

Yeah cause it’s completely unimaginable that a professional writer would use em dash /s

https://www.nightwater.email/em-dash-ai/

I do dread the wave of AI slop coming our way. But honestly what I dread even more is the comments that’s going to second guess every other article and comment, just because they use some character or style that people have decided is a sign of being AI generated. That’s gonna get tedious real fast.

Re: Men, where have you gone? Please come back

#8

My ChatGPT meter tells me that it *feels* like this was written by AI: Notice the excessive use of the em dash throughout the article combined with the sycophantic contrasts ChatGPT loves to use so much: "It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless." A sad state of affairs if the NYT is letting AI-slop through.

The dashes thing is really only a tell for high schoolers and obvious illiterates –writers can and do use them. Next we need to teach GPT about interrobangs.

Re: Men, where have you gone? Please come back

#9

My ChatGPT meter tells me that it *feels* like this was written by AI: Notice the excessive use of the em dash throughout the article combined with the sycophantic contrasts ChatGPT loves to use so much: "It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless." A sad state of affairs if the NYT is letting AI-slop through.

Your ChatGPT meter is probably broken
Post reply on HN