Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
blogs.gnome.org
Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
1–10 of 179 posts
Re: Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
#2Re: Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
#3I know it's going to be painful for non-Linux users but volunteer devs can't be expected to cover all bases.
Re: Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
#4Re: Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
#5It used to be the de facto FOSS desktop in the GNOME 2.x days but things changed with the release of Gnome 3 and I’ve not really noticed Gnome ever bounce back since.
Re: Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
#6This is a good move. Without having endless resources keeping the codebase small and focused just makes sense. I know it's going to be painful for non-Linux users but volunteer devs can't be expected to cover all bases.
Re: Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
#7[flagged]
Re: Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
#8Re: Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
#9What is Gnomes market share like these days? It used to be the de facto FOSS desktop in the GNOME 2.x days but things changed with the release of Gnome 3 and I’ve not really noticed Gnome ever bounce back since.
Re: Introducing stronger dependencies on systemd
#10What is Gnomes market share like these days? It used to be the de facto FOSS desktop in the GNOME 2.x days but things changed with the release of Gnome 3 and I’ve not really noticed Gnome ever bounce back since.
it just works, though it is far less customizable compared to KDE, it is far more stable -still only compared to KDE..