Why Embodied AI Is the Red Line We Cannot Cross
chrbutler.com
Why Embodied AI Is the Red Line We Cannot Cross
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Why Embodied AI Is the Red Line We Cannot Cross
#2Article needs to address the premise more clearly. Why can't we embody AI?
The author seems afraid that AI would replace and wipe out humans.
1) Is that a bad thing? 2) the author is literally anthropomorphising AI - giving it traits of humans (aggression, desire for conflict, genocide) just because they might look human.
These are not encessary truths and the article leaves them totally unaddressed. There may be valid evidence and support for 1 and 2 being bad/true but since they're not covered the article is just unsubstantiated fearmongering.
The real topic is "how do we ensure our bad traits aren't passed on to AI made in our image".
Re: Why Embodied AI Is the Red Line We Cannot Cross
#3Article needs to address the premise more clearly. Why can't we embody AI? The author seems afraid that AI would replace and wipe out humans. 1) Is that a bad thing? 2) the author is literally anthropomorphising AI - giving it traits of humans (aggression, desire for conflict, genocide) just because they might look human. These are not encessary truths and the article leaves them totally unaddressed. There may be val…
I'm not sure if you've read the AI 2027 report, but that's what this post is responding to. It's not the author anthropomorphizing AI. That's the entire premise of the AI 2027 forecast.
Re: Why Embodied AI Is the Red Line We Cannot Cross
#4Seems pretty straightforward that AI wiping out humans is a bad thing.
Re: Why Embodied AI Is the Red Line We Cannot Cross
#5Article needs to address the premise more clearly. Why can't we embody AI? The author seems afraid that AI would replace and wipe out humans. 1) Is that a bad thing? 2) the author is literally anthropomorphising AI - giving it traits of humans (aggression, desire for conflict, genocide) just because they might look human. These are not encessary truths and the article leaves them totally unaddressed. There may be val…
[deleted]