Mathematician solves algebra's oldest problem using intriguing number sequences
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Mathematician solves algebra's oldest problem using intriguing number sequences
#2Re: Mathematician solves algebra's oldest problem using intriguing number sequences
#3Re: Mathematician solves algebra's oldest problem using intriguing number sequences
#4Interesting, but I wish they went deeper into the geodes and how it all actually works. ACM might do a more technical writeup.
Re: Mathematician solves algebra's oldest problem using intriguing number sequences
#5In the real numbers there exists a number that encodes the answer to the halting problem for every number, it's provable and also provable that you cannot write a program to print the digits.
Of course it's a computer scientist doing this. I'll have to read his papers. I wonder if he has anything about rational differential equations.
Re: Mathematician solves algebra's oldest problem using intriguing number sequences
#6I've also felt that real numbers aren't real ever since I tried doing algebra in floating point numbers and finding that some formulas that can be reversed in math cannot be reversed on a computer. In the real numbers there exists a number that encodes the answer to the halting problem for every number, it's provable and also provable that you cannot write a program to print the digits. Of course it's a computer scie…
One should realize that the implementation choice to represent floating numbers in the way it is done in processors is related to performance and memory usage.
Re: Mathematician solves algebra's oldest problem using intriguing number sequences
#7This has been discussed before. I understand that it is not a new result and also not an exact result: A method for constructing an infinite sequence of approximations to the exact solution. It has been long proven that exact solutions do not exist above a certain degree.
> A method for constructing an infinite sequence of approximations to the exact solution.
They just rename it as a "exact" method and rename the old "radical" as inexact. In math definitions change from time to time, but in any case they didn't solve the old problem.