NSF stops awarding new grants and funding existing ones
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: NSF stops awarding new grants and funding existing ones
#2Just from a steady state picture there is now significantly less funding flowing to America's research institutions and institutes. At some point buildings will be shut down, infrastructure mothballed and a generation of scientists will simply not be trained.
An adversary could not ask for a better outcome.
Re: NSF stops awarding new grants and funding existing ones
#3The only priorities the Trump administration has is in enforcing their myopic right-wing worldview and continuing their Manchurian Candidate destruction of our future by crippling science and education, and alienating the best and brightest people from around the world to make sure they don't come here to live and work, or leave as soon as possible.
We're going to be paying the price for this administration's actions for decades, if not for the rest of our country's existence.
(If you think this is too political for HN, or an over-reaction, remember that's what you said before the election as well. We weren't wrong then, and we're not wrong now.)
Re: NSF stops awarding new grants and funding existing ones
#4Re: NSF stops awarding new grants and funding existing ones
#5Between NIH grant-making being slowed down and this, there is no way to interpret these moves than being an underhanded way of causing university research infrastructure to collapse. Consider also, for example, that one Friday last month there was an announcement that indirect rates being cut to 15% for Dept. of Energy grants.. but only for universities, not companies or national labs! Just from a steady state pictur…
Re: NSF stops awarding new grants and funding existing ones
#6Between NIH grant-making being slowed down and this, there is no way to interpret these moves than being an underhanded way of causing university research infrastructure to collapse. Consider also, for example, that one Friday last month there was an announcement that indirect rates being cut to 15% for Dept. of Energy grants.. but only for universities, not companies or national labs! Just from a steady state pictur…
Our adversaries are happy either way.
Re: NSF stops awarding new grants and funding existing ones
#7Between NIH grant-making being slowed down and this, there is no way to interpret these moves than being an underhanded way of causing university research infrastructure to collapse. Consider also, for example, that one Friday last month there was an announcement that indirect rates being cut to 15% for Dept. of Energy grants.. but only for universities, not companies or national labs! Just from a steady state pictur…
I've got some bad news - NSF basically announced the same thing today
Re: NSF stops awarding new grants and funding existing ones
#8Hopefully more forward thinking developed and developing countries can step up and resurrect the US model that made it so successful and lure top talent to their more welcoming shores.
Re: NSF stops awarding new grants and funding existing ones
#9Between NIH grant-making being slowed down and this, there is no way to interpret these moves than being an underhanded way of causing university research infrastructure to collapse. Consider also, for example, that one Friday last month there was an announcement that indirect rates being cut to 15% for Dept. of Energy grants.. but only for universities, not companies or national labs! Just from a steady state pictur…
I don't think this is necessarily the right way to go about it, but there are deep issues with the incentives in the current US research system. As someone embedded in it, I would say it's highly dysfunctional and inefficient. Too much scientific fraud (hard and soft) and too many sinecures. Our adversaries are happy either way.
I've heard locally we're cutting graduate programs down and similarly from other institutions.
Re: NSF stops awarding new grants and funding existing ones
#10the "updates on priorities" page on NSF's web site is deeply dystopian: https://www.nsf.gov/updates-on-priorities
However, I wonder, which parts of the statement do you consider "deeply dystopian"?