How NASA Is Using Graph Technology and LLMs to Build a People Knowledge Graph
1–10 of 56 posts
Re: How NASA Is Using Graph Technology and LLMs to Build a People Knowledge Graph
#2Any idea which LLM they're using?
Re: How NASA Is Using Graph Technology and LLMs to Build a People Knowledge Graph
#3NASA announced LLMs in early days (years ago) - it seemed like they wanted to understand their own document libraries! What else could be inferred here? mass layoffs plus "people substitutes" ? is there a more diplomatic way to see this?
Re: How NASA Is Using Graph Technology and LLMs to Build a People Knowledge Graph
#4> What made you choose memgraph? ... And then Memgraph showed me the cost. That kind of sold me for time for us to be able to do that.
It's an ad post about memgraph.
Re: How NASA Is Using Graph Technology and LLMs to Build a People Knowledge Graph
#5NASA announced LLMs in early days (years ago) - it seemed like they wanted to understand their own document libraries! What else could be inferred here? mass layoffs plus "people substitutes" ? is there a more diplomatic way to see this?
The only connection between "they wanted to understand their own document libraries" and "mass layoffs" is potentially "increased efficiency leads to needing less people for the same job". If there's anything else, please let me know.
And if it's that, then are you suggesting to not implement a certain technological efficiency tool in order to keep (now clearly redundant) jobs? That has never worked long-term in the history of mankind, AFAIK.
Re: How NASA Is Using Graph Technology and LLMs to Build a People Knowledge Graph
#6As an alternative to a pure graph db (e.g. here, memgraph), has anyone here used Apache's AGE graph-database extension for Postgresql? For making a knowledge graph that can live alongside SQL?
Re: How NASA Is Using Graph Technology and LLMs to Build a People Knowledge Graph
#7> 27K nodes and 230K edges
This is such an overkill for that kind of data. Even if they do plan to "scale up significantly", I doubt that they'll actually experience any benefit of graph db.
Re: How NASA Is Using Graph Technology and LLMs to Build a People Knowledge Graph
#8> What made you choose memgraph? ... And then Memgraph showed me the cost. That kind of sold me for time for us to be able to do that. It's an ad post about memgraph.
Yes, domain is memgraph and it seems to be a marketing case study.
Re: How NASA Is Using Graph Technology and LLMs to Build a People Knowledge Graph
#9Memgraph is laughably expensive - I honestly wonder what anyone actually uses it for outside of companies that just don't care about infra spend.
Re: How NASA Is Using Graph Technology and LLMs to Build a People Knowledge Graph
#10> It’s [sql] just not built for the complex relationships that exist in a massive organizations like NASA.
This is an absurd claim.
> Extracted Skills from Team Resumes
> Extracted Skills
> Subject Matter Experts Finder Question: designed to identify employees with expertise in specific domains or mission-critical capabilities.
I can't think of anything that screams "incompetent management" more than this. So, to find a subject matter expert, you're going to "extract skills" and "extract resumes" to answer abstract questions about your staff... without ever once.. just _talking_ to your staff?
What a cold and bizarre future these people think we want to live in.
Meanwhile can we use technology to improve the level of connectivity I have and experience as an employee? Can you please stop asking LLMs to "extract" things about me into goofy automated pipelines? If you want skilled workers then you need to demonstrate skilled management. This is all the exact opposite of that.