No post body was provided.
Untitled topic
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: undefined
#2[deleted]
Re: undefined
#3The first time should have been a job disqualifying act… dude does it again this time with friends and family?
How many soldiers, intelligence staff, contractors would get toasted for doing this once?
Re: undefined
#4Discussion (86 points, 3 hours ago, 30 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43747310
(23 points, 4 hours ago, 4 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43746981
Re: undefined
#5His cellphone should be taken away.
Seriously, if he keeps his job, he should hire someone to do his communicating. A secretary in other words.
Re: undefined
#6His cellphone should be taken away. Seriously, if he keeps his job, he should hire someone to do his communicating. A secretary in other words.
If you need a solution, you need to address the problem. And the problem here isn't the cellphone. It's only a symptom.