Why Cursor's flat-fee pricing could lead to its downfall
blog.kilocode.ai
Why Cursor's flat-fee pricing could lead to its downfall
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Why Cursor's flat-fee pricing could lead to its downfall
#2[deleted]
Re: Why Cursor's flat-fee pricing could lead to its downfall
#3We're definitely in the golden age of AI plan pricing, and I suspect we'll see plans for consumers scale similarly to the way we've seen streaming. There's no way $20/month is profitable, but I don't know much I would actually pay for it as a consumer. $30 sure, $40 may be pushing it. Will my business have to pay like $200/head? Maybe more?
Re: Why Cursor's flat-fee pricing could lead to its downfall
#4We're definitely in the golden age of AI plan pricing, and I suspect we'll see plans for consumers scale similarly to the way we've seen streaming. There's no way $20/month is profitable, but I don't know much I would actually pay for it as a consumer. $30 sure, $40 may be pushing it. Will my business have to pay like $200/head? Maybe more?
I want usage based pricing for AI, not a bunch of monthly subscriptions like we have with streaming
Re: Why Cursor's flat-fee pricing could lead to its downfall
#5Proof that even developers fall for "marketing schemes".