Hacker Laws
hacker-laws.com
Hacker Laws
1–10 of 24 posts
Re: Hacker Laws
#2So many people get Occam’s razor wrong. I like the way you describe it as the least number of concepts and assumptions, rather than just “simplest”.
Re: Hacker Laws
#3So many people get Occam’s razor wrong. I like the way you describe it as the least number of concepts and assumptions, rather than just “simplest”.
I feel this is a side-effect of so many people getting "simple" wrong, as in, calling things simple because they superficially seem so, even while being aware of but ignoring the underlying complexities.
Re: Hacker Laws
#4Sometimes I see a post and immediately know it’s going to take over my day. I’ll probably spend at least three hours reading this and the linked wikipedia articles.
Re: Hacker Laws
#5To the author: Nice site. The very first link, https://effective-shell/, is broken.
Re: Hacker Laws
#6Please add
Jevons Paradox
Re: Hacker Laws
#7To the author: Nice site. The very first link, https://effective-shell/ , is broken.
Re: Hacker Laws
#8To the author: "Download the PDF eBook" link
https://github.com/dwmkerr/hacker-laws/releases/download/v0....
is broken
Re: Hacker Laws
#9[deleted]
Re: Hacker Laws
#10Good collection. One rule I found missing is the Rule of Three: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_three_(computer_prog...