LLVM Back End for MoonBit
moonbitlang.com
LLVM Back End for MoonBit
1–10 of 20 posts
Re: LLVM Back End for MoonBit
#2MoonBit supports the LLVM backend. With this, it achieved 8× Java’s performance in FFT and introduced out-of-the-box debugging with DWARF symbol injection, enabling precise source mapping directly to compiled outputs.
MoonBit will soon compile directly to native binary files without relying on a C compiler. This eliminates various compatibility issues associated with C compilers.
Re: LLVM Back End for MoonBit
#3[dead]
Re: LLVM Back End for MoonBit
#4How does MoonBit’s LLVM backend compare to Zig or Rust?
Re: LLVM Back End for MoonBit
#5[dead]
Re: LLVM Back End for MoonBit
#6MoonBit supports the LLVM backend. With this, it achieved 8× Java’s performance in FFT and introduced out-of-the-box debugging with DWARF symbol injection, enabling precise source mapping directly to compiled outputs. MoonBit will soon compile directly to native binary files without relying on a C compiler. This eliminates various compatibility issues associated with C compilers.
Does this mean MoonBit will get JIT support soon?
Re: LLVM Back End for MoonBit
#7Wonder how the LLVM backend affects compile times. Anyone tried it yet?
Re: LLVM Back End for MoonBit
#8[dead]
Re: LLVM Back End for MoonBit
#9I assume there was a C backend before — some numbers comparing that and the wasm backend with LLVM would’ve been helpful."
Re: LLVM Back End for MoonBit
#10I assume there was a C backend before — some numbers comparing that and the wasm backend with LLVM would’ve been helpful."
[dead]