Jeffrey Goldberg on being added to the group chat by Trump Administration
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: Jeffrey Goldberg on being added to the group chat by Trump Administration
#2Re: Jeffrey Goldberg on being added to the group chat by Trump Administration
#3Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43462783
Re: Jeffrey Goldberg on being added to the group chat by Trump Administration
#4The house GOP guys that dragged Hillary through all those committees are going to be _so mad_ when they find out about this
Re: Jeffrey Goldberg on being added to the group chat by Trump Administration
#5Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43462783
why was this link not easily accessible in the first place?
Re: Jeffrey Goldberg on being added to the group chat by Trump Administration
#6Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43462783
why was this link not easily accessible in the first place?
It was initially flagged when first submitted getting it relegated to the pages 3 and 4. Then it seems the flags got removed (or it got enough upvotes?) so it was on the front page for a few hours. Now it's on the second page (probably a combination of flags, if still enabled, and flamewar detection). It's #3 here: https://news.ycombinator.com/active
Re: Jeffrey Goldberg on being added to the group chat by Trump Administration
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
why was this link not easily accessible in the first place?
It was initially flagged when first submitted getting it relegated to the pages 3 and 4. Then it seems the flags got removed (or it got enough upvotes?) so it was on the front page for a few hours. Now it's on the second page (probably a combination of flags, if still enabled, and flamewar detection). It's #3 here: https://news.ycombinator.com/active
ah - i usually view using https://hckrnews.com/
it seems for whatever reason the above viewer omits it
Re: Jeffrey Goldberg on being added to the group chat by Trump Administration
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
why was this link not easily accessible in the first place?
It was initially flagged when first submitted getting it relegated to the pages 3 and 4. Then it seems the flags got removed (or it got enough upvotes?) so it was on the front page for a few hours. Now it's on the second page (probably a combination of flags, if still enabled, and flamewar detection). It's #3 here: https://news.ycombinator.com/active
I don't think that's quite right.
I think some combination of having "Trump" in the title and theatlantic.com as the host and possibly something specific to the submitter penalized it so that it never hit the front page. Since hckrnews.com only shows articles that hit the front, it's not on there.
I'm only guessing, but see the graph here: https://hnrankings.info/43462783/. It doesn't show the clear drop that you'd expect with flags or flamewar, and doesn't appear to ever crack #59. If anything, it looks like it rose sharply when penalties were removed.
Re: Jeffrey Goldberg on being added to the group chat by Trump Administration
#9Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43462783
why was this link not easily accessible in the first place?
"accessible"? Been on site for half a day, seen by hundreds, gradually getting upvoted and discussed, available on all major HN aggregators etc. Well accessible, but it's old news by tonight. Stuff moves fast around here.
Re: Jeffrey Goldberg on being added to the group chat by Trump Administration
#10Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43462783
why was this link not easily accessible in the first place?
That is my question as well. It has almost 1000 points yet remains on page two of March 24.