OpenAI Says It's "Over" If It Can't Steal All Your Copyrighted Work
1–10 of 85 posts
Re: OpenAI Says It's "Over" If It Can't Steal All Your Copyrighted Work
#2The product requires crime? I feel like most products do not require crime. This is not a good sales pitch.
Re: OpenAI Says It's "Over" If It Can't Steal All Your Copyrighted Work
#3[dead]
Re: OpenAI Says It's "Over" If It Can't Steal All Your Copyrighted Work
#4Some good news for a change!
Re: OpenAI Says It's "Over" If It Can't Steal All Your Copyrighted Work
#5It sounds like government continuing to honor the property rights of everyone is getting in the way of a handful of rich people's desire to take all that value for themselves.
Re: OpenAI Says It's "Over" If It Can't Steal All Your Copyrighted Work
#6I think we just need to rethink copyright for language models. I'm okay just licensing 1 copy of a work to any LLM model throughout its various generations. Just don't pirate it if no special license is available, buying the ebook should suffice. It should be no different from a human buying a copy. The rule should only be that it does not leak the entire work.
Re: OpenAI Says It's "Over" If It Can't Steal All Your Copyrighted Work
#7It sounds like government continuing to honor the property rights of everyone is getting in the way of a handful of rich people's desire to take all that value for themselves.
By this logic Google Search couldn't exist. Except that Google won those cases.
Re: OpenAI Says It's "Over" If It Can't Steal All Your Copyrighted Work
#8[deleted]
Re: OpenAI Says It's "Over" If It Can't Steal All Your Copyrighted Work
#9It sounds like government continuing to honor the property rights of everyone is getting in the way of a handful of rich people's desire to take all that value for themselves.
By this logic Google Search couldn't exist. Except that Google won those cases.
How is Google search breaking copywrite?
Re: OpenAI Says It's "Over" If It Can't Steal All Your Copyrighted Work
#10Copyright infrigement is not stealing[0]. The person still has what they made. Not sure why they propigate it as theft. Seems like a pro copyright propaganda extremisit article which goes significantly against progress of advancements for arts and sciences.
[0]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowling_v._United_States_(19...