Live data from Hacker News

They wanted to save us from a dark AI future. Then six people were killed

theguardian.com

1–10 of 65 posts

Re: They wanted to save us from a dark AI future. Then six people were killed

#3
The article is drama piece that makes you go on a scavenger hunt for the Five Ws. I stopped reading as soon as I noticed the pattern. I would ask AI to summarize, but my enthusiasm for learning anything from this kind of article has waned dramatically over the years.

Re: They wanted to save us from a dark AI future. Then six people were killed

#5
post #4

ChatGPT, please summarize in bullet points.

This is the start of modern illiteracy.

Start... We are already very far advanced as far as I can see. You wouldn't know if you hang with university students; they seem, at least the ones I employ/talk to, far more knowledgeable than the young me was, however, when I talk to other young people, they don't want to and are not very good at processing textual information. They need to have it spoken and in a very information sparse format. It's somewhat depressing, so I hope it's just the people I meet and what I read online, but I don't think so.

Re: They wanted to save us from a dark AI future. Then six people were killed

#6
post #3

The article is drama piece that makes you go on a scavenger hunt for the Five Ws. I stopped reading as soon as I noticed the pattern. I would ask AI to summarize, but my enthusiasm for learning anything from this kind of article has waned dramatically over the years.

It's a stylistic choice, many people like reading this kind of piece. You don't have to read it. There's room on the web for different kinds of writing styles.

Re: They wanted to save us from a dark AI future. Then six people were killed

#8
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the start of modern illiteracy.

Start... We are already very far advanced as far as I can see. You wouldn't know if you hang with university students; they seem, at least the ones I employ/talk to, far more knowledgeable than the young me was, however, when I talk to other young people, they don't want to and are not very good at processing textual information. They need to have it spoken and in a very information sparse format. It's somewhat depre…

Name a generation that didn't think the youth 'lost it.'

Re: They wanted to save us from a dark AI future. Then six people were killed

#9
post #4

ChatGPT, please summarize in bullet points.

This is the start of modern illiteracy.

Such sentiments have been expressed so many times that I have lost track of all of the times variations on them have been expressed. I think it started with Socrates who claimed the written word would damage human recall. When nobody believed him and he became popular because of the written word, people inverted “literacy is bad” into “literacy is good”. In more recent times, I believe radio and TV were said to be the start of modern illiteracy.

By the way, for what it is worth, only 2% of the population can read at a college level. It had been that way for so long that I heard that the category was merged into the high school level several years ago to make the literacy rate in the top bracket 4% instead of the prior 2%. i.e. “modern illiteracy” started a long time ago if we go by numbers.

Re: They wanted to save us from a dark AI future. Then six people were killed

#10
post #9
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the start of modern illiteracy.

Such sentiments have been expressed so many times that I have lost track of all of the times variations on them have been expressed. I think it started with Socrates who claimed the written word would damage human recall. When nobody believed him and he became popular because of the written word, people inverted “literacy is bad” into “literacy is good”. In more recent times, I believe radio and TV were said to be th…

Maybe Socrates was correct? I certainly think Google has damaged my memory, or maybe just age, hard to say.
Post reply on HN