Live data from Hacker News

2025 Hiring Pause

hr.cornell.edu

1–10 of 173 posts

Re: 2025 Hiring Pause

#4
> due to "significant financial uncertainty" in higher education,

This is directly linked to the new Trump administration's policies. The university explicitly cites potential deep cuts to federal research funding, new tax legislation affecting endowment income, and ongoing concerns about rapid growth and escalating costs as primary reasons for this decision.

This move comes as Cornell and 11 other universities have filed a lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health over funding restrictions that could cost Cornell $80 million. The university's four-month hiring freeze coincides with similar measures at other prestigious institutions like Stanford, MIT, and Northwestern, all responding to the broader context of the Trump administration's proposals to eliminate the Department of Education and Executive Orders reducing scientific research funding.

This new US government is deeply hurting itself and destroying most valuable assets. Which it needs to compete against China or Europe.

Re: 2025 Hiring Pause

#7
If anything in any country should be free, it should be education. And, obviously, the administration of education should never be a for-profit venture.

Valuing democracy and being able to select sensible leaders depends on it.

Re: 2025 Hiring Pause

#9
Here is a 2024 article from the Stanford Daily: https://stanforddaily.com/2024/03/13/behind-stanfords-double...

In 1996: 13,811 students, 1488 faculty, 5881 total staff.

In 2024: 17,529 students, 2323 faculty, 16,527 total staff.

In 28 years: 27% increase in students 56% increase in faculty 281% increase in total staff

The ratio of staff to students is nearly 1:1

This is insane.

Re: 2025 Hiring Pause

#10

Cornell has an endowment of 10.7 billion dollars. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2024/10/university-endowmen...

And what? You know that for example endowment funds have restrictions on what they can be spent on.

This is really victim blaming. I would not have an issue if the government has said that for future grant rounds there will be limits on overheads, but this lot just decided they cut already agreed and planned budgets and no matter the consequences.

Post reply on HN