How Core Git Developers Configure Git
blog.gitbutler.com
How Core Git Developers Configure Git
1–10 of 129 posts
Re: How Core Git Developers Configure Git
#2The diff changes are awesome, and I always wondered why there isn't a global .gitignore file in the first place, seeing that every .gitignore file basically has (mostly) the same content
Re: How Core Git Developers Configure Git
#3Wow this is neat. I never really bothered to deep-dive into my git configuration, but some of these are really cool. The diff changes are awesome, and I always wondered why there isn't a global .gitignore file in the first place, seeing that every .gitignore file basically has (mostly) the same content
Re: How Core Git Developers Configure Git
#4Wow this is neat. I never really bothered to deep-dive into my git configuration, but some of these are really cool. The diff changes are awesome, and I always wondered why there isn't a global .gitignore file in the first place, seeing that every .gitignore file basically has (mostly) the same content
There's also a possible downside here in having things hidden for you but not for others since it's not in your `.gitignore` project file.
I'm honestly kind of on the fence about this one, I don't have much in that file for those reasons.
Re: How Core Git Developers Configure Git
#5Re: How Core Git Developers Configure Git
#6Wow this is neat. I never really bothered to deep-dive into my git configuration, but some of these are really cool. The diff changes are awesome, and I always wondered why there isn't a global .gitignore file in the first place, seeing that every .gitignore file basically has (mostly) the same content
I think it's the most readable and understandable diff.
Re: How Core Git Developers Configure Git
#7Re: How Core Git Developers Configure Git
#8> Personally, I don’t have a problem with master
> updating the default value. I wish Git had some taste here, but they don't
So author has no preference, but git does not have a good taste here, for not breaking backward compatibility. Typical passive agresive bullshit!
I think "main" is not inclusive enough, we should use something like "non-specific-but-strong-branch". Or something that includes even stronger message. And change it every year (or month). It could be automated using github actions on all existing repos!
Also please rename "git" command, it is very insensitive word!!!
Re: How Core Git Developers Configure Git
#9Re: How Core Git Developers Configure Git
#10How much of this is for a noob like me that just uses vscode? I hardly ever see the git command line, and when I do see it, its trouble beyond what anybody can fix...