Yocto, RockPi and SBOMs: Building modern embedded Linux images
1–10 of 125 posts
Re: Yocto, RockPi and SBOMs: Building modern embedded Linux images
#2Re: Yocto, RockPi and SBOMs: Building modern embedded Linux images
#3Love Yocto! It has a learning curve but it took about a week from nothing to an embedded image including Swift and Flutter apps, U-Boot, etc. A curve worth climbing.
Re: Yocto, RockPi and SBOMs: Building modern embedded Linux images
#4if you want to get a little weird, you can tell yocto to compile everything into deb packages and host them yourself with something like aptly
Re: Yocto, RockPi and SBOMs: Building modern embedded Linux images
#5>you can’t run “apt update” if you want to get a little weird, you can tell yocto to compile everything into deb packages and host them yourself with something like aptly
Re: Yocto, RockPi and SBOMs: Building modern embedded Linux images
#6Love Yocto! It has a learning curve but it took about a week from nothing to an embedded image including Swift and Flutter apps, U-Boot, etc. A curve worth climbing.
Re: Yocto, RockPi and SBOMs: Building modern embedded Linux images
#7Love Yocto! It has a learning curve but it took about a week from nothing to an embedded image including Swift and Flutter apps, U-Boot, etc. A curve worth climbing.
I ended up completing the project on time and under budget by adopting a strict "compiler on-board" approach (i.e. no cross-compiling), so that's where I got a bit dissatisfied with the Yocto approach of having a massive cross-compiling tooling method to deal with.
I'll have to give it another go, but I do find that if I have to have a really beefy machine to get started on an embedded project, somethings' not quite right.
Re: Yocto, RockPi and SBOMs: Building modern embedded Linux images
#8Love Yocto! It has a learning curve but it took about a week from nothing to an embedded image including Swift and Flutter apps, U-Boot, etc. A curve worth climbing.
I always found buildroot a lot easier to fathom and harness. And certainly flexible enough with the ability patch every included recipe and package.
Re: Yocto, RockPi and SBOMs: Building modern embedded Linux images
#9Which is a pity, because when used correctly it's really powerful!
From the article, I can't help but mention that one third of the "key terminology" is about codenames. What do people have with codenames? I can count and easily know that 5 comes after 4. But I don't know how to compare Scarthgap and Dunfell (hell, I can't even remember them).
Re: Yocto, RockPi and SBOMs: Building modern embedded Linux images
#10I have (accident) become the yocto SME at my $dayjob. Probably the biggest positive has been free SBOM generation, and cooking things like kSLOC counts into recipes.
The learning curve stinks, the build suite is very powerful.