Live data from Hacker News

It's pretty easy to cut $2T from the federal budget

pluralistic.net

1–10 of 13 posts

Re: It's pretty easy to cut $2T from the federal budget

#3
post #2

The title of the article says “easy”, while the text says “straightforward”. Those are not synonyms.

Collins dictionary disagrees:

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaur...

and

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaur...

They are each their others 2nd top synonyms

Re: It's pretty easy to cut $2T from the federal budget

#5
We regularly have the same here in the UK - "let's go after £1.7b in benefits fraud" but never "lets go after the £120b in taxes that are evaded". We lost more to COVID fraud than we did to benefits fraud, but seem to have just written that off largely - it even seems to have been committed by people in our House of Lords.

I am all for doing both these things - but let's go after the biggest prize(s) first.

Re: It's pretty easy to cut $2T from the federal budget

#8
post #3
post #2

The title of the article says “easy”, while the text says “straightforward”. Those are not synonyms.

Collins dictionary disagrees: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaur... and https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaur... They are each their others 2nd top synonyms

The article even uses them interchangeably between the title and the first paragraph

Re: It's pretty easy to cut $2T from the federal budget

#9
post #2

The title of the article says “easy”, while the text says “straightforward”. Those are not synonyms.

I agree that the spectrum of "effort needed" is not the same as "clarity of process", and ideally people wouldn't blur the lines... But it happens anyway.

For example: Moving a heavy exercise-weight one mile in a straight line through an open field field is very straightforward... but not necessarily easy.

Post reply on HN