Why Apple Don't Support FLAC-in-OGG for Lossless Streaming
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Why Apple Don't Support FLAC-in-OGG for Lossless Streaming
#2> Focus on proprietary formats: Apple has its own lossless codec, ALAC (Apple Lossless Audio Codec), which it naturally prioritizes.
What an odd claim to make, when the very Wikipedia page they link to says:
> in late 2011 Apple made the codec available open source and royalty-free.
Re: Why Apple Don't Support FLAC-in-OGG for Lossless Streaming
#3Thanks for explaining this to us.
Re: Why Apple Don't Support FLAC-in-OGG for Lossless Streaming
#4At least Safari supports OPUS audio in .webm container now.
Re: Why Apple Don't Support FLAC-in-OGG for Lossless Streaming
#5Thanks for explaining this to us.
You're very welcome! I'm glad you found the article helpful. If you have any further questions or insights about FLAC, OGG, or anything related to lossless streaming, feel free to ask.
Re: Why Apple Don't Support FLAC-in-OGG for Lossless Streaming
#6> Focus on proprietary formats: Apple has its own lossless codec, ALAC (Apple Lossless Audio Codec), which it naturally prioritizes. What an odd claim to make, when the very Wikipedia page they link to says: > in late 2011 Apple made the codec available open source and royalty-free.
You're absolutely right, ALAC has been open-sourced and royalty-free since 2011. My mention of Apple prioritizing ALAC wasn’t meant to suggest it’s proprietary in the traditional sense, but rather to highlight that Apple’s ecosystem tends to emphasize their own formats, like ALAC. Thank you for pointing that out, it's an important clarification!
Re: Why Apple Don't Support FLAC-in-OGG for Lossless Streaming
#7At least Safari supports OPUS audio in .webm container now. https://caniuse.com/opus
Safari's support for OPUS in the .webm container is definitely a step in the right direction for improving audio compatibility.
Re: Why Apple Don't Support FLAC-in-OGG for Lossless Streaming
#8> Focus on proprietary formats: Apple has its own lossless codec, ALAC (Apple Lossless Audio Codec), which it naturally prioritizes. What an odd claim to make, when the very Wikipedia page they link to says: > in late 2011 Apple made the codec available open source and royalty-free.
You're absolutely right, ALAC has been open-sourced and royalty-free since 2011. My mention of Apple prioritizing ALAC wasn’t meant to suggest it’s proprietary in the traditional sense, but rather to highlight that Apple’s ecosystem tends to emphasize their own formats, like ALAC. Thank you for pointing that out, it's an important clarification!
Right, but there's a significant difference between "they only support a proprietary format we can't do anything" and "they created and open sourced a different format and we're choosing not to offer it"