We're probably going to sue Cloudflare
kovalent.systems
We're probably going to sue Cloudflare
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: We're probably going to sue Cloudflare
#2[deleted]
Re: We're probably going to sue Cloudflare
#3If by some miracle anyone from Cloudflare wants to contact us they can email us at hi@kovalent.systems.
I reached out.
Re: We're probably going to sue Cloudflare
#4I fear a near future where where Kafkaesque mystery systems inflict confusion and injustice with no human route for fixes or even explanation.
Especially as companies shoehorn in LLMs to make unreliable decisions and bullshit explanations with a false veneer of trustability.
Re: We're probably going to sue Cloudflare
#5If by some miracle anyone from Cloudflare wants to contact us they can email us at hi@kovalent.systems. I reached out.
Thanks jgrahamc, that's an absurd response time. I've replied.
Re: We're probably going to sue Cloudflare
#6If by some miracle anyone from Cloudflare wants to contact us they can email us at hi@kovalent.systems. I reached out.
Thanks jgrahamc, that's an absurd response time. I've replied.
I would have reached out in less than 4 minutes but your blog was so long it took me a while to digest it!
Re: We're probably going to sue Cloudflare
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks jgrahamc, that's an absurd response time. I've replied.
I would have reached out in less than 4 minutes but your blog was so long it took me a while to digest it!
If you could seriously consider the idea of giving accounts support based on their total account spend rather than zone plans (such as if you spend over 200/mo you get business support regardless of your zone plans) it would have let us get suitably prompt chat support for most of our issues over the years, probably including this one, without the need of the public jgc batsignal.