Live data from Hacker News

Firefox Beta 15 supports the new Opus audio format

hacks.mozilla.org

1–10 of 111 posts

Re: Firefox Beta 15 supports the new Opus audio format

#5
post #3

Luckily it's going to be W3C standard, and Apple and MS won't be able to use their lame excuses to avoid implementing it in their browsers, like they did for Vorbis, VP8 and etc.

Doesn't Apple's lame excuse of unknown patents apply to all technologies?

Re: Firefox Beta 15 supports the new Opus audio format

#6
post #4

I went into the article thinking why isn't OGG good enough, and the xkcd joke about 15 different standards. I left pleased about this new standard (from an advert, any downsides?) but need some patent assurances. If Mozilla are happy will everyone be?

Unfortunately, according to Wikipedia, Skype holds software patents on parts of the algorithm. Even though they said they'd make them avaiable royalty-free, this still means it isn't completely free.

Re: Firefox Beta 15 supports the new Opus audio format

#8
post #6
post #4

I went into the article thinking why isn't OGG good enough, and the xkcd joke about 15 different standards. I left pleased about this new standard (from an advert, any downsides?) but need some patent assurances. If Mozilla are happy will everyone be?

Unfortunately, according to Wikipedia, Skype holds software patents on parts of the algorithm. Even though they said they'd make them avaiable royalty-free, this still means it isn't completely free.

free_enough + available > completely_free

Re: Firefox Beta 15 supports the new Opus audio format

#10
post #6
post #4

I went into the article thinking why isn't OGG good enough, and the xkcd joke about 15 different standards. I left pleased about this new standard (from an advert, any downsides?) but need some patent assurances. If Mozilla are happy will everyone be?

Unfortunately, according to Wikipedia, Skype holds software patents on parts of the algorithm. Even though they said they'd make them avaiable royalty-free, this still means it isn't completely free.

In what way is using a technology not free, if you are given a royalty-free license to use the patents on it? (Honest question, I don't know what you mean here.)
Post reply on HN