Calling women 'household objects' now permitted on Facebook

I can understand simplifying moderation rules (making the less verbose, but by extension seemingly allowing some new things) but actually taking the time to spell out that these things are allowed, as the article alleges, seems bizarre.

Re: Calling women 'household objects' now permitted on Facebook

#7

Post by BitterCritter » Wed, Jan 08, 2025, 10:05 AM UTC

I wonder what strange little people this rule was removed for. Sexism just stupefies me and I wonder how someone with the intelligence to breath could render such words.

Re: Calling women 'household objects' now permitted on Facebook

#8

Post by Oras » Wed, Jan 08, 2025, 10:06 AM UTC

raxxor wrote: post #2

This is outrage bait and pretty low even for CNN.

They made a report showing alleged prisoner in Syria who turned to be an intelligent officer in Assad’s regime. So don’t expect any better.

Source https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/12/16/middleeast/syria-assad-pr...

Re: Calling women 'household objects' now permitted on Facebook

#9

Post by Oras » Wed, Jan 08, 2025, 10:07 AM UTC

It’s not shame on any media making these article, it’s shame that there are people still reading this shitrag and similar shitrags.

Re: Calling women 'household objects' now permitted on Facebook

#10

Post by anonzzzies » Wed, Jan 08, 2025, 10:08 AM UTC

I am all for real free speech about anything. It's just never real free speech; it's always censored and influenced (drowned out or amplified which is basically the same thing) in some direction. X is not free speech and this won't be either.

What I do hope is that this will drive the banning of Meta, X and others from the EU. I know this will hurt a lot of people short term, but long term, we might be the only part of the world without a severe mental illness epidemic.