IPv6-only Network based on Jool

#1

Post by unclet » Mon, Jan 06, 2025, 5:24 AM UTC

IPv6-only Network based on Jool
taoshu.in

Re: IPv6-only Network based on Jool

#2

Post by NewJazz » Mon, Jan 06, 2025, 6:49 AM UTC

Doesn't openbsd do this without out of tree kernel modules? I'm kind of allergic to dkms and friends.

Re: IPv6-only Network based on Jool

#3

Post by j16sdiz » Mon, Jan 06, 2025, 8:16 AM UTC

NewJazz wrote: post #2

Doesn't openbsd do this without out of tree kernel modules? I'm kind of allergic to dkms and friends.

OpenBSD do stateless NAT64. You can do the same on linux using Tundra in userspace.

Re: IPv6-only Network based on Jool

#4

Post by zorked » Mon, Jan 06, 2025, 9:28 AM UTC

Why do I need to even think about entering a contractual relationship with "13 TCF vendor(s) and 64 ad partners" before reading a blog post? The subject sounded interesting but the lack of respect for me is enormous.

Re: IPv6-only Network based on Jool

#5

Post by rnhmjoj » Mon, Jan 06, 2025, 9:40 AM UTC

zorked wrote: post #4

Why do I need to even think about entering a contractual relationship with "13 TCF vendor(s) and 64 ad partners" before reading a blog post? The subject sounded interesting but the lack of respect for me is enormous.

Just read the Jool documentation which is vastly superior: https://nicmx.github.io/Jool/en/documentation.html#introduct....

Re: IPv6-only Network based on Jool

#6

Post by [deleted] » Mon, Jan 06, 2025, 9:52 AM UTC

zorked wrote: post #4

Why do I need to even think about entering a contractual relationship with "13 TCF vendor(s) and 64 ad partners" before reading a blog post? The subject sounded interesting but the lack of respect for me is enormous.

[deleted]

Re: IPv6-only Network based on Jool

#7

Post by gertrunde » Mon, Jan 06, 2025, 10:19 AM UTC

Not sure I entirely agree with :

"Here is the classical topology of home network." ... "And all the LAN hosts have one /64 IPv6 prefix."

Are people really deploying IPv6 like this? Rather than a /64 to a vlan?

(Personally, in the home, I'm just using DHCPv6-PD to delegate a different /64 to each VLAN).

Re: IPv6-only Network based on Jool

#8

Post by rfoo » Mon, Jan 06, 2025, 11:02 AM UTC

gertrunde wrote: post #7

Not sure I entirely agree with : "Here is the classical topology of home network." ... "And all the LAN hosts have one /64 IPv6 prefix." Are people really deploying IPv6 like this? Rather than a /64 to a vlan? (Personally, in the home, I'm just using DHCPv6-PD to delegate a different /64 to each VLAN).

Or maybe a "classical" (I assume author meant "typical"?) home network does not have multiple VLANs.

Re: IPv6-only Network based on Jool

#9

Post by tsimionescu » Mon, Jan 06, 2025, 11:19 AM UTC

gertrunde wrote: post #7

Not sure I entirely agree with : "Here is the classical topology of home network." ... "And all the LAN hosts have one /64 IPv6 prefix." Are people really deploying IPv6 like this? Rather than a /64 to a vlan? (Personally, in the home, I'm just using DHCPv6-PD to delegate a different /64 to each VLAN).

Who has multiple VLANs in a home network??

Re: IPv6-only Network based on Jool

#10

Post by tikkabhuna » Mon, Jan 06, 2025, 11:33 AM UTC

tsimionescu wrote: post #9

gertrunde wrote: post #7

Not sure I entirely agree with : "Here is the classical topology of home network." ... "And all the LAN hosts have one /64 IPv6 prefix." Are people really deploying IPv6 like this? Rather than a /64 to a vlan? (Personally, in the home, I'm just using DHCPv6-PD to delegate a different /64 to each VLAN).

Who has multiple VLANs in a home network??

Definitely the realm of homelabbers, but I do. Mainly to segregate IoT devices, users, lab servers.

That is only because I want to though, I agree that the average home network will not have VLANs.