Unix Time and a Modest Proposal
johndcook.com
Unix Time and a Modest Proposal
1–10 of 43 posts
Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal
#2Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal
#3 The ratio is around 365.2422. Calling it 365 is too crude. Julius Caesar said we should call it 365 1/4, and that was good enough for a while.
This is blowing my mind that thousands of years ago they were able to measure the orbits to this level of accuracy.Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal
#4Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal
#5Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal
#6As with the subject article, Swift's work begins reasonably enough, and contains much great discussion before veering off wildly at the end.
Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal
#7It should be a structured of the iso datetime fields, like in "struct tm", see https://cplusplus.com/reference/ctime/tm/
Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal
#8Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal
#9This makes no sense:
> … or not add leap seconds and allow the year to drift with respect to the day.
Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal
#10And for the other challenge, to stabilize the variation of the the sidereal year (i.e. the gravities of Jupiter &c. pulling the orbit slightly faster or slower), we simply schedule the launches at either the fore- (morning) or aft- (evening) ends.
To anyone sympathetic to my ideology, please consider using "fore", "aft", "port", and "starboard" to refer to the morning, evening, day, and night quadrants of the clock.