Live data from Hacker News

Unix Time and a Modest Proposal

johndcook.com

1–10 of 43 posts

Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal

#3

  The ratio is around 365.2422. Calling it 365 is too crude. Julius Caesar said we should call it 365 1/4, and that was good enough for a while.
This is blowing my mind that thousands of years ago they were able to measure the orbits to this level of accuracy.

Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal

#6
The title refers to a 1729 Jonathan Swift essay, "A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People from Being a Burthen to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Publick"[1].

As with the subject article, Swift's work begins reasonably enough, and contains much great discussion before veering off wildly at the end.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Modest_Proposal

Re: Unix Time and a Modest Proposal

#10
The simplest solution is to uplift a polite portion of the Earth's mass into an orbital habitation ring, and use a feedback controller to regulate the amounts being launched, to keep the rotational period stabilized (in accordance with conservation of angular momentum) at an integer ratio to the sidereal year.

And for the other challenge, to stabilize the variation of the the sidereal year (i.e. the gravities of Jupiter &c. pulling the orbit slightly faster or slower), we simply schedule the launches at either the fore- (morning) or aft- (evening) ends.

To anyone sympathetic to my ideology, please consider using "fore", "aft", "port", and "starboard" to refer to the morning, evening, day, and night quadrants of the clock.

Post reply on HN