Jury finds Cognizant discriminated against US workers
1–10 of 72 posts
Re: Jury finds Cognizant discriminated against US workers
#2Re: Jury finds Cognizant discriminated against US workers
#3[flagged]
Re: Jury finds Cognizant discriminated against US workers
#4[flagged]
Except Indians are the richest ethnic group in the country.
Re: Jury finds Cognizant discriminated against US workers
#5In 2003, Jeff DeMarrais would've been on TV telling us that there were no Americans in Iraq.
Re: Jury finds Cognizant discriminated against US workers
#6The next administration's think tank's plan to solve this is to eliminate the program altogether. There was also talk in a video I think from Jamelle Bouie of the NYT talking about these groups going further and declaring anyone that subsequently went on to be naturalized while living here under these and other programs to have their citizenship revoked. The idea being that only applying for citizenship under the slow process while you are in your home country will be seen as legal, and this is a part of the Chevron Deference ruling. I'd love to hear anyone weigh in on that from a legal standpoint, or offer anything specifically refuting it, and of course all of this will be immediately challenged, so, no reason to feel like the fight has been lost before it has begun.
Some stuff about wanting to highly restrict these programs:
https://www.rnlawgroup.com/project-2025-and-work-based-immig...
https://www.murthy.com/2024/07/29/how-project-2025-could-imp...
Re: Jury finds Cognizant discriminated against US workers
#7Re: Jury finds Cognizant discriminated against US workers
#8The next administration's think tank's plan to solve this is to eliminate the program altogether. There was also talk in a video I think from Jamelle Bouie of the NYT talking about these groups going further and declaring anyone that subsequently went on to be naturalized while living here under these and other programs to have their citizenship revoked. The idea being that only applying for citizenship under the slo…
> There was also talk in a video I think from Jamelle Bouie of the NYT talking about these groups going further and declaring anyone that subsequently went on to be naturalized while living here under these and other programs to have their citizenship revoked.
Does he actually have some evidence they're planning on doing that, and have plausible plans to execute it, or is it the typical hyperbolic fear-mongering from Trump's opponents? Retroactively revoking the citizenship of every H1-B who went on to get naturalized (after probably a 10 year process and relying on the law as universally understood at the time), sounds like utter nonsense that probably hasn't been seriously proposed and would go nowhere if it was.
> and this is a part of the Chevron Deference ruling
Do you have any idea what the Chevron Deference ruling was? IIRC, it only says the courts have to make their own interpretation when a regulatory law is ambiguous, rather than always deferring to the interpretation of an executive agency. I don't think it means "all these regs are null and void now, kthxbye."
Re: Jury finds Cognizant discriminated against US workers
#9Shocking absolutely no one. It is no secret that outsourcing companies like Cognizant, Infosys, TCS, HCL, Wipro, Accenture, E&Y have been openly abusing the H-1B visa and the immigration system as a whole for decades. Lawsuits and fines are just a cost of doing business for them.
Meanwhile the debate surrounding it always devolves into "pro immigration" and "anti immigration" with the same generic talking points and all of the actual substance is lost.