Live data from Hacker News

Modern Mathematics (Pre-Print) Cutting-edge math for today's coder

artima.com

1–10 of 16 posts

Re: Modern Mathematics (Pre-Print) Cutting-edge math for today's coder

#3
post #2

One can argue that today’s coder needs to understand how code-generating LLMs work. Which means learning a bit of linear algebra, calculus, and probability/stats.

Not sure I agree.

"A bit of linear algebra, calculus and probability/stats" would make you better equipped at leveraging LLM? Or do you mean that having "a bit" of those you would be able to implement/train you own custom LLM to write code for you?

Re: Modern Mathematics (Pre-Print) Cutting-edge math for today's coder

#4
post #2

One can argue that today’s coder needs to understand how code-generating LLMs work. Which means learning a bit of linear algebra, calculus, and probability/stats.

I agree that most coders would be well served to learn some linear algebra and probability theory as those are ubiquitous. Calculus and stats are also useful depending on your specialty. LLMs don't really change any of this.

Re: Modern Mathematics (Pre-Print) Cutting-edge math for today's coder

#9

Why is the title so generic? It seems the subtitle is the real title…

Yes, the title is comically non-specific. It is also mildly misleading: the table of contents/abstract mention boolean logic (after John Boole, 1815–1864), set theory (Georg Cantor, 1845–1918), Curry-Howard correspondence (middle 20th century), etc.

It does say "This book is not for mathematicians" — or the nit-picking historians of mathematics I imagine... Plus one should not judge a book by its cover or anything written thereon.

Re: Modern Mathematics (Pre-Print) Cutting-edge math for today's coder

#10
post #2

One can argue that today’s coder needs to understand how code-generating LLMs work. Which means learning a bit of linear algebra, calculus, and probability/stats.

I don’t think that’s the case really; if you go in the HPC/scientific computing direction and learn a bunch about linear algebra, how much does it teach you about LLMs? I did some linear algebra stuff… but LLMs just look like oddly shaped GEMVs.
Post reply on HN