Live data from Hacker News

Myths and Urban Legends About Dual-Socket Servers

amd.com

1–10 of 30 posts

Re: Myths and Urban Legends About Dual-Socket Servers

#6
post #3

This article reads like an AMD advertisement for their EPYC processor line.

I think that's because it is.

True, but it reminds us that advertising can be educational, technical, and straightforward instead of manipulative, emotional, and focus-grouped.

There's nothing wrong per se with writing an article about your awesome product and why everyone should use it

Re: Myths and Urban Legends About Dual-Socket Servers

#7
My understanding is that one factor pushing hyperscalers towards dual-socket was the cost of the network fabric - for the longest time, having two CPU sockets per NIC / per leaf switch port was the overall system price/performance sweet spot for many workloads. More sockets required more expensive CPUs, while single-socket servers need twice as many NICs and twice as many top-of-rack switchports.

With newer/faster ethernet standards you still need twice as many NICs but you can often split the lanes coming out of a switch chip and use a Y cable.

Post reply on HN