An update on Google's compliance with the DMA
1–10 of 54 posts
Re: An update on Google's compliance with the DMA
#2Re: An update on Google's compliance with the DMA
#3Re: An update on Google's compliance with the DMA
#4This is a great argument for breaking up Google because they've created an anti-competitive environment where other parties cannot succeed without Google gatekeeping them.
Re: An update on Google's compliance with the DMA
#5I don't think I've ever read a company whinging so much about having to obey the law. Comes across like a petulant child.
Apple has their share as does Microshaft. Once you climb to the top of the ladder, you get awarded to behave this way. At least that's the way it is perceived.
Re: An update on Google's compliance with the DMA
#6I don't think I've ever read a company whinging so much about having to obey the law. Comes across like a petulant child.
It does not help consumers to have outside parties run roughshod over businesses. Regulations are necessary, but to be effective, they must be measured, in both senses of the word. To be implemented carefully, they must be subject to criticism, even by the party being regulated.
Do you have any specific concerns with the points raised by Google here?
Re: An update on Google's compliance with the DMA
#7This is a great argument for breaking up Google because they've created an anti-competitive environment where other parties cannot succeed without Google gatekeeping them.
Sincerely asking... help me connect the dots there? Suppose Google is broken up into separate businesses, one for search and one for ads. Is the idea that the search side would have no incentive to show hotel search results on a map? I'm not seeing the connection between the breakup proposal and the features discussed in the post.
Re: An update on Google's compliance with the DMA
#8I don't think I've ever read a company whinging so much about having to obey the law. Comes across like a petulant child.
Re: An update on Google's compliance with the DMA
#9This is a great argument for breaking up Google because they've created an anti-competitive environment where other parties cannot succeed without Google gatekeeping them.
Sincerely asking... help me connect the dots there? Suppose Google is broken up into separate businesses, one for search and one for ads. Is the idea that the search side would have no incentive to show hotel search results on a map? I'm not seeing the connection between the breakup proposal and the features discussed in the post.
Re: An update on Google's compliance with the DMA
#10We can but dream...