Live data from Hacker News

Everyone is capable of, and can benefit from, mathematical thinking

quantamagazine.org

1–10 of 419 posts

Re: Everyone is capable of, and can benefit from, mathematical thinking

#2
I’m far from being any kind of serious mathematician, but I’ve learned more in the last couple years of taking that seriously as an ambition than in decades of relegating myself to inferiority on it.

One of the highly generous mentors who dragged me kicking and screaming into the world of even making an attempt told me: “There are no bad math students. There are only bad math teachers who themselves had bad math teachers.”

Re: Everyone is capable of, and can benefit from, mathematical thinking

#3
> everyone can, and should, try to improve their mathematical thinking — not necessarily to solve math problems, but as a general self-help technique

Agreed with the above. Almost everyone can probably expand their mathematical thinking abilities with deliberate practice.

> But I do not think this is innate, even though it often manifests in early childhood. Genius is not an essence. It’s a state. It’s a state that you build by doing a certain job.

Though his opinion on mathematical geniuses above, I somewhat disagree with. IMO everyone has a ceiling when it comes to math.

Re: Everyone is capable of, and can benefit from, mathematical thinking

#4
> the provocative claim

Leibniz made that claim centuries ago in his critical remarks on John Locke's Essay on Human Understanding. Leibniz specifically said that Locke's lack of mathematical knowledge led him to (per Leibniz) his philosophical errors regarding the nature of 'substance'.

https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/leibniz1705book...

Re: Everyone is capable of, and can benefit from, mathematical thinking

#5
I studied math hard for several years in college and graduate school—purely out of interest and enjoyment, not for any practical purpose. That was more than forty years ago, but Bessis's description of the role of intuition in learning and doing math matches my recollection of my subjective experience of it.

Whether that youthful immersion in math in fact benefitted me in later life and whether that kind of thinking is actually desirable for everyone as he seems to suggest—I don't know. But it is a thought-provoking interview.

Re: Everyone is capable of, and can benefit from, mathematical thinking

#6
I used to get very frustrated that others could not intuit information the way I could. I have a lot of experience trying to express quantities to leaders and policymakers.

At the very minimum, I ask people to always think of the distribution of whatever figure they are given.

Just that is far more than so many are willing to do.

Re: Everyone is capable of, and can benefit from, mathematical thinking

#7
This guy is unbelievably French (I mean in his intellectual character). Here I was expecting a kind of rehash of the 20th century movements of pure math and high modernism[0], but instead we get a frankly Hegelian concept of math or at least a Hegel filtered through 20th and 21st century French philosophy.

[0]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41962944

Re: Everyone is capable of, and can benefit from, mathematical thinking

#8
post #3

> everyone can, and should, try to improve their mathematical thinking — not necessarily to solve math problems, but as a general self-help technique Agreed with the above. Almost everyone can probably expand their mathematical thinking abilities with deliberate practice. > But I do not think this is innate, even though it often manifests in early childhood. Genius is not an essence. It’s a state. It’s a state that y…

> IMO everyone has a ceiling when it comes to math.

Yes, but it's higher than you think: https://www.justinmath.com/your-mathematical-potential-has-a...

Re: Everyone is capable of, and can benefit from, mathematical thinking

#9
A nice sentiment but clearly a large % of people never do learn even basic mathematical thinking and seem very confused by it. So is there some scientific study backing up the claim that all these people could easily learn it or are we just making it up because its a nice egalitarian thesis for a math popularization book?
Post reply on HN