M4 Mac mini's efficiency
jeffgeerling.com
M4 Mac mini's efficiency
1–10 of 632 posts
Re: M4 Mac mini's efficiency
#2Edit: This is in contrast to my M1 Macbook Air with 16GB of ram which would stutter a lot during color grading. So definitely feeling the improvement.
Re: M4 Mac mini's efficiency
#3Re: M4 Mac mini's efficiency
#4Re: M4 Mac mini's efficiency
#5Re: M4 Mac mini's efficiency
#6Re: M4 Mac mini's efficiency
#7M4 Mac Mini with 16GB RAM is doing a "good enough" job of editing 6k raw footage in Premiere for my team. I'm surprised to say I'm content with the 16GB of ram so far. Edit: This is in contrast to my M1 Macbook Air with 16GB of ram which would stutter a lot during color grading. So definitely feeling the improvement.
Re: M4 Mac mini's efficiency
#8That's great - I wonder if you could get one working with Kamal [1] and Cloudflare Tunnel [2] to run public web apps from a home computer? [1] https://kamal-deploy.org/ [2] https://www.cloudflare.com/products/tunnel/
Re: M4 Mac mini's efficiency
#9A good fanless build with a i3-14100T is more expensive and 40-50% slower on Geekbench. An i5 is a bit closer. Some 2024 Ryzen CPUs can match or exceed its multicore performance, but these are also more expensive and much less energy efficient. Pricewise, things start favoring PCs if you need more RAM, as Mac upgrades are costly.
One can potentially use Nix on a Mac Mini to keep similar development environments to those used in Linux, but AFAIK some packages are not supported on ARM. Any experiences using Nix and nix-darwin as a daily driver?
Re: M4 Mac mini's efficiency
#10I can’t help but wish that Apple would provide the handful of features needed to make a Mac mini into a competent home server.