Paracelsus: Revolutionary or Mystic?
historytoday.com
Paracelsus: Revolutionary or Mystic?
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Paracelsus: Revolutionary or Mystic?
#2Re: Paracelsus: Revolutionary or Mystic?
#3The guy is clearly a fasion maven!!! I mean, look at that hat!
He seriously needs his own twerk tic channel! He's an influenza!
Re: Paracelsus: Revolutionary or Mystic?
#4Re: Paracelsus: Revolutionary or Mystic?
#5Re: Paracelsus: Revolutionary or Mystic?
#6I don't see the contradiction here. He does not claim to have only learned from ordinary people, just that he wasn't ashamed to do so. And that quote says nothing at all about his origins, humble or not.
In general, I don't understand the point of this article. It feels like a hit piece, but to what end?
Also, it really shouldn't come as a surprise that he was an alchemist. He lived during the sixteenth century. The alchemist that would go on to formulate classical mechanics was born a century after Paracelsus' death.
Re: Paracelsus: Revolutionary or Mystic?
#7Re: Paracelsus: Revolutionary or Mystic?
#8I think Paracelsus was a committed contrarian who was going against a medical system that had a lot wrong with it and how it understood the body. That means he was correct in a lot of his criticisms, but he wasn't really any better when he came up with his own ideas.