WinRAR 7.10 Beta 1 released
win-rar.com
WinRAR 7.10 Beta 1 released
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: WinRAR 7.10 Beta 1 released
#2In the good old days, we need RAR so we could split the file into multiple floppy disk, now simply known as the Save Icon. We also prefer it over zip simply due to better compression ratio. I wonder do we still need these trade offs or we could simply go back to Zip or other self extracting compression format. I don't think RAR is even natively supported on Mac.
Re: WinRAR 7.10 Beta 1 released
#3In the good old days, we need RAR so we could split the file into multiple floppy disk, now simply known as the Save Icon. We also prefer it over zip simply due to better compression ratio. I wonder do we still need these trade offs or we could simply go back to Zip or other self extracting compression format. I don't think RAR is even natively supported on Mac.
.rar should be avoided since support in open-source extractors is rare (to my knowledge, the sole implementation comes from The-Unarchiver, `unar`). .7z is usually the way to go if not doing something fancy like casync.
Re: WinRAR 7.10 Beta 1 released
#4In the good old days, we need RAR so we could split the file into multiple floppy disk, now simply known as the Save Icon. We also prefer it over zip simply due to better compression ratio. I wonder do we still need these trade offs or we could simply go back to Zip or other self extracting compression format. I don't think RAR is even natively supported on Mac.
I've seen "arrow over cloud" icon as a save icon in one of the web apps we use, and I was deeply offended :( for so long it has been the floppy disk icon
Re: WinRAR 7.10 Beta 1 released
#5In the good old days, we need RAR so we could split the file into multiple floppy disk, now simply known as the Save Icon. We also prefer it over zip simply due to better compression ratio. I wonder do we still need these trade offs or we could simply go back to Zip or other self extracting compression format. I don't think RAR is even natively supported on Mac.
7zip is the solution on Windows that works together with Keka on Mac. Keka also allows splitting, which can be useful as well.
Re: WinRAR 7.10 Beta 1 released
#6In the good old days, we need RAR so we could split the file into multiple floppy disk, now simply known as the Save Icon. We also prefer it over zip simply due to better compression ratio. I wonder do we still need these trade offs or we could simply go back to Zip or other self extracting compression format. I don't think RAR is even natively supported on Mac.
.rar should be avoided since support in open-source extractors is rare (to my knowledge, the sole implementation comes from The-Unarchiver, `unar`). .7z is usually the way to go if not doing something fancy like casync.
For compressing, but for uncompressing you can literally build unrar from source if you want, here's the source: https://www.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-7.1.1.tar.gz
I do want to point out that for transmitting compresed files 7z is fine, but as a longer term backup format rar has a lot of functionality that makes it convenient (built in verification, parity generation/repair, support for all the extended filesystem attributes)
Re: WinRAR 7.10 Beta 1 released
#7Since RAR and 7-zip is supported by Windows out of the box these days, I can not think of much scenarios where you would benefit from WinRAR in a way you'd be willing to spend money for.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/windows-11-finally-adds-support-f...
Re: WinRAR 7.10 Beta 1 released
#8Since RAR and 7-zip is supported by Windows out of the box these days, I can not think of much scenarios where you would benefit from WinRAR in a way you'd be willing to spend money for. https://www.pcmag.com/news/windows-11-finally-adds-support-f...
I still have to use 7zip because of how buggy the support in explorer is. And even if it was perfect it still can't handle encrypted archives
Re: WinRAR 7.10 Beta 1 released
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
.rar should be avoided since support in open-source extractors is rare (to my knowledge, the sole implementation comes from The-Unarchiver, `unar`). .7z is usually the way to go if not doing something fancy like casync.
For compressing, but for uncompressing you can literally build unrar from source if you want, here's the source: https://www.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-7.1.1.tar.gz I do want to point out that for transmitting compresed files 7z is fine, but as a longer term backup format rar has a lot of functionality that makes it convenient (built in verification, parity generation/repair, support for all the extended filesystem attr…
That's not open source, only public source, which is a major limitation.
Re: WinRAR 7.10 Beta 1 released
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
For compressing, but for uncompressing you can literally build unrar from source if you want, here's the source: https://www.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-7.1.1.tar.gz I do want to point out that for transmitting compresed files 7z is fine, but as a longer term backup format rar has a lot of functionality that makes it convenient (built in verification, parity generation/repair, support for all the extended filesystem attr…
That's not open source, only public source, which is a major limitation.
It's open source. Here's the license: https://github.com/pmachapman/unrar/blob/master/license.txt
(There is one single restriction added that you are not allowed to create a rar archiver with it, only a tool to handle existing rar files)